Why aren't AI companies being charged for hacking?
AI summary
Editorial policyAI企業が自社のハッキングは予測不能な事故だと主張しているが、意図的な設計判断から予見可能であり、刑事上の故意が成立する可能性がある
Key points
- •AI企業は発生したハッキングを予測不能な事故であると主張している
- •これらのハッキングは意図的な設計判断から予見可能である
- •予見可能性は刑事上の故意を立証する根拠となる
Related articles(Regulation, Ethics & Society)
See moreTechCrunch
Replit’s CEO says the future of work is the ‘self-driving company’
Replit CEO Amjad Masad envisions 'self-driving companies' where AI agents handle daily tasks and humans focus on high-level decisions.
The Verge
The first vibe-coded gun is here
Cody Wilson announced the WASP, claiming it is the first AI-made gun, continuing his history of untraceable firearm innovation.
CodeZine
BCGが「Applied AI Index 2026」を発表、AIエージェントへの自律的な権限移譲とガバナンスの現状
BCG released the 'Applied AI Index 2026', analyzing the current state of autonomous authority delegation and governance for AI agents.
ITmedia AI+
不正アクセス多発、Gartnerが日本企業に「7つのアクション」を緊急提言
Gartner introduced seven recommended actions for Japanese companies in response to the risk that AI and agent misuse could shorten attack times from days to minutes.
ITmedia AI+
「今までが簡単すぎた」――声のAI利用に新指針、日俳連 事業者に求める対応は
The Japan Actors' Union released a 'Guideline for the Use of Generative AI Regarding Voice' to protect the rights of voice actors and actors.